THE PROBLEM WE ARE FACING IS THAT OUR SIGNAL IS OF 1mV BUT THE NOISE OUTPUT AT THE OPT101 END IS AROUND 22mV. BECAUSE OF THIS WE ARE UNABLE TO DETECT THE SIGNAL. CAN ANYONE SUGGEST THE OPAMP FOR THE SAME AS WELL AS HOW TO REDUCE THE NOISE FROM THE SIGNAL.?
WE ARE USING OPT101 PHOTO-DIODE ,IN OUR APPLICATION THE VOLTAGE OUTPUT AT OPT101 IS 1mV, WE WANT TO AMPLIFY THIS SIGNAL WITH VERY LOW NOISE. CAN ANYONE SUGGEST ME THE OPAMP SUITABLE FOR THIS? THE OPERATING REAUENCY IS 10KHz.
RTOS/INA223: INA223 Equation2 and Power Modes description
LMC7221: HBM/CDM/MM Data of LMC7221AIM5X/NOPB
Part Number:LMC7221
Hello,
Customer Gemtek Technology Co., Ltd. requests for HBM/CDM/MM Data.
I can't find data from Datasheet, could anyone help to reply?
Thank you.
PGA5807A: LNA solution
Part Number:PGA5807A
Dear E2E,
Do we have LNA solution which spec is shown in below?
Operating Frequency 734 ~ 960MHz
Gain 13 dB
NF 1.1 dB
Supply voltage 1.5~3.3V 2.8V (typ.)
BR,
Jason
INA3221: register map for "current" monitor
LM358B: lm358 LM358B
test - will delete
test thread #6134
I HAVE A SIGNAL OF 100uS PULSE-WIDTH, WITH 4-PULSES/SECOND, IN THIS IF I WANT TO APPLY A LOW PASS FILTER TO REMOVE NOISE WHAT SHOULD BE THE CUT OFF SO AS TO RETAIN MY SIGNAL SHAPE AND REMOVE THE NOISE.
I HAVE A SIGNAL OF 100uS PULSE-WIDTH, WITH 4-PULSES/SECOND, IN THIS IF I WANT TO APPLY A LOW PASS FILTER TO REMOVE NOISE WHAT SHOULD BE THE CUT OFF SO AS TO RETAIN MY SIGNAL SHAPE AND REMOVE THE NOISE.
LM393: LM393 output sink current
Part Number:LM393
Hello Sirs,
We have a sink current not enough issue for LM393 output low .
There's proportion that LM393 can't sink current up to 10mA .Will cause output voltage not low enough .
Below is test circuit . Would you pls give advice if this test method ok or not ?
BTW. Current limit setting is by power supply .
Many thanks !
BOOSTXL-TLV8544PIR: Can this PIR sensor used by LaunchPad CC2640R2 Board? How can I learn to use it?
Part Number:BOOSTXL-TLV8544PIR
Hi,
I want to use the BOOSTXL-TLV8544PIR sensor with LaunchPad CC2640R2 Board to detect motion in a building corridors and transform motion sensor situation through Bluetooth. I follows the "BOOSTXL-TLV8544PIR User's Guide", which is download from TI website (www.ti.com/.../BOOSTXL-TLV8544PIR). However, the user's guide indicates that the sensor with CC2650 LaunchPad board, but I have only CC2640R2.
Following the user's guide, I download "Flash Programmer 2", "BOOSTXL-TLV8544PIR FIRMWARE" and "BOOSTXL-TLV8544PIR GUI". I download the "BOOSTXL-TLV8544PIR FIRMWARE" to the sensor by using SmartRF Flash Programmer 2. I also try to install the "LaunchPad windows driver installation". However, the GUI does not work. It always shows me the "Auto COM port detection has failed ......". I try the user's guide suggestion. It doesn't work. I also find the motion sensor green led is not on, which means the LaunchPad board is not ready (This is the user's guide's explain.). When I try to move my hands in front of the sensor, the red led does not on, either the yellow led. I think the sensor does not work. I check the hardware setup. I connect the sensor on the LaunchPad CC2640R2. Then, I connect LaunchPad CC2640R2 to PC using the USB cable. The two jumper blocks are all installed on the sensor board. I can not find any mistake of hardware setup. I have no idea how to use the sensor without CC2650 LaunchPad board.
My question is that. Is this BOOSTXL-TLV8544PIR only works with LaunchPad CC2650? Or, it can be used in other board. For an example, I have LaunchPad CC2640R2. I think the sensor should work in other LanchPad board. Where can I find the software introduction of how to use the sensor with LaunchPad CC2640R2? I am a stranger of TI development board. Can anybody give some suggestion, where can I start to learn the sensor operation? Can I learn the GPIO interrupt or TI-diver of the LaunchPad CC2640R2 and then try to control the BOOSTXL-TLV8544PIR sensor?
By the way, should I make sure the sensor works? For example, the green led on the sensor board should be on. How can I make the sensor works on LaunchPad CC2640R2? Does the LaunchPad CC2640R2 need a program code? where can I find it?
Regards, Robert Yang
OPA192: the output voltage of OPA192 has spikes
Part Number:OPA192
The amplifier part number is OPA192IDBVR and the schematic is as below. When the load current value changes from 3A to 81.72A, changing frequency is 1kHz and slope of it 2.5A/us, the output voltage of OPA192 was shown as below figure. Could you please explain why the output voltage has such spikes(red circles)?
INA2128: Regarding current consumption
INA2128: Regarding current consumption
TIA
Hello everyone, can I convert the weak current signal into a voltage signal and amplify this signal? Which chip should I use?
LMV358-N: LMV358MX/NOPB
OPA2376:Can TI replace OPA2376 chip?
TLV314-Q1: behavior at short of adjacent pin
LM321: slewrate is sufficient for driving 20v/usec
OPA170: Using OpAmp as attenuator: less than unity gain done wrong?
Part Number:OPA170
Hello all,
my question is closely related to https://e2e.ti.com/support/amplifiers/f/14/t/177561
The issue there was to use an operational amplifier as attenuator (e.g., to convert an input voltage from 0..10 V to 0..2.5 V). As solution, a voltage divider to bring down the input voltage followed by a (unity-gain) buffer was suggested. This seems in line with what the book "Op Amps for Everyone" (by Carter, Mancini) suggests. The book explicitly warns not to use an inverting opamp as attenuator:
However, I've seen this configuration (0 < |G| < 1) suggested several times (e.g., on electronics stackexchange here). Additionally, I've read discussions where people contest Mancini's statement. They are saying that a non-inverting gain of 1 is the worst-case for op amp feedback stability, which is equivalent to an inverting gain of zero. They conclude that if the OpAmp is specified to be stable at unity-gain buffer configuration, it should be stable at less than unity gain in an inverting configuration, too.
Coming back to the original issue, what's wrong with this solution to the question (except that the output is "inverted"), using an inverting OpAmp as attenuator:
This is the link to the simulation.
Thanks!
LMC6062: MAX478CSA/LT2178CS8 equivalent.
Part Number:LMC6062
Hi Team,
My customer is doing project(upgrade) on medical device and looking for P2P equivalent against MAX478CSA/LT2178CS8.
We have done below comparison (attached) with multiple device and found LMC6062 matches most of the spec.
Can you please suggest any device better than LMC6062.
(Please visit the site to view this file)
Regards, Shinu Mathew.