Quantcast
Channel: Amplifiers forum - Recent Threads
Viewing all 18973 articles
Browse latest View live

LM2917-N: LM2918-N

$
0
0

Part Number:LM2917-N

RE LM2917/ LM2907

I am looking to use a series of these IC's on a turbine project to trigger multiple relays from multiple circuits at intervals of increasing turbine speeds

Hz will range from 30 - 180. The voltage from the sensor will be ideally o.1v but can be increased if needed to say 1.4v 

Can have Vcc at 12v 

the relay control voltage is 4 - 30 DC

If I replace R1 with a rheostat on each circuit will I be able to set this up to so that the emitter voltage will reach 4 volts on a succession of relays at increasing turbine speed? I think this would be by progressively decreasing the Ohm's from one circuit to the next. 

any help much appreciated. 


INA149: Total Input Offset Voltage

$
0
0

Part Number:INA149

Hello Team,

I would like to calculate total input offset voltage of INA149. Could you please check that below calculation is correct? I assume that worst case. 

Vos_initial = 1100uV

Vos_drift = 15uV/Celcius * (80 Celcius - 25 Celcius) = 825uV

Vos_PSRR = 120dB -> Is it correct? How can I change this to voltage value?

Vos_CMRR = Vincm * 10^(90/20) = Vincm * 31.6uV -> Vincm is common-mode voltage of INA149 input

Total input offset = Vos_initial + Vos_drift + Vos_PSRR + Vos_CMRR

When input common-mode changed, these change only affect to Vos_CMRR?

Best regards,

OPA1S2385EVM: PCB Layout Question

$
0
0

Part Number:OPA1S2385EVM

My question about the OPA1S2385EVM is about the PCB layout of some of the parts. Most of the critical parts have "Void" areas underneath them on the other side of the PCB. Is this to reduce leakage current?  What is the purpose of these void areas?

Is this common practice in transimpedance amps? Does it make a significant difference?

 

 

 

OPA320: Photodiode amplifier settles in (relatively) long time

$
0
0

Part Number:OPA320

I have a very basic photodiode amplifier using an OPA320, connected like the following

which exhbits a behavior that I can't completely understand.

The photodiode is filtered from visible light, and a nearby light source is a high current pulsed IR emitter (around 0.5 Amps) for a relatively short time, 28 us pulses over 225 us of period. I have a measure to take place when this IR source is OFF (yes, this is not the emission I'm measuring).

My problem is that besides I'm synchronized with the "disturbing" light (I generate it for another purpose), I need to measure a secondary tiny light level within 30-40 us after I turned this lighthouse off.
Note: this secondary signal isn't even "visible" at the output of this amplifier, since it needs further amplification.

The circuit above is first limited to avoid saturation of the OA, even though with OPA320 this shouldn't be an issue (should come out of saturation way faster than my 30 us to a measure). I expected the level to take some time (microseconds?) to settle at the low light/dark level, after being dazzled, but what I obtain is something like this

The yellow trace is the analog output, and the green one is the high power LED control (with a simple on/off control).

Why does the output take so long to settle at the dark level? What puzzles me more is the shape of the decaying curve, which isn't related to feedback capacitor.

I inherited this circuit from an older design, so I can't even explain why with some very similar setup it worked in the past, while I'm apparently unable to make it work!
The original circuit used also another classic scheme, with a discrete JFET stage inserted between the PD and the OA, but that doesn't change the output result of this amplifier.

OPA1679: Thermal test report

$
0
0

Part Number:OPA1679

Hi Audio Amplifiers Team,

Now we would like to prmote OPA1679 .

The customer turn down to use 4 channel op because of the thermal problem they met before on other 4 channel OP parts.

 

I need your support for thermal test report on full load condition of OPA1679.

The report will give confidence to use OPA1679.

Thank you in advance.

OPA350: output impedance of the output to ground

$
0
0

Part Number:OPA350

I made a mistake in a circuit design and ended up with results I am struggling to understand. It seems there is about 50 ohms from the output pin to ground. Is this number stated anywhere? Is it the same for all OPA350s or is there some variability from part to part? I used it as a comparator, single supply, 5 volts and ground.

Thanks in advance,

Charlie

TLV8802: TLV8802 vs AD8502ARJZ

$
0
0

Part Number:TLV8802

dear Sir 

Our IOT project would like to use AD8502ARJZ (SOT23-8) ,May I know TI have Iq=nA 2channel op ??

Thanks 

TLV2372-Q1: the specification will not change even after 10 years on user board ?

$
0
0

Part Number:TLV2372-Q1

Hi Team

one of big Car makers(GM) asked about the parameters spec(DC Offset/Unity Gain Bandwidth/Slew Rate at unity Gain) can still be inside of Datasheet spec even after 15 years liftime on user board ? may I get BU's confirm ?


INA148-Q1: the specification will not change even after 10 years on user board ?

$
0
0

Part Number:INA148-Q1

Hi Team

one of big Car makers(GM) asked about the parameters spec(DC Offset/Gain Error/Gain Nonlinearity) can still be inside of Datasheet spec after 15 years liftime on user board ? may I get BU's confirm ?

XTR115: XTR115 about the limit current question

$
0
0

Part Number:XTR115

Hi team,

The customer would like to use XTR115. The limit current for XTR115 is 32mA in the datasheet. But the customer would like to limit the current to 25mA.

Is there any solution?

Best Wishes,
Mickey Zhang
Asia Customer Support Center
Texas Instruments

PGA5807A: PGA5807 LTspice simulation model

$
0
0

Part Number:PGA5807A

Hello everyone,

in the last few hours, I tested the LTspice simulation model of the PGA5807.

If I compare the low-pass filter response of the datasheet to the filter response of the simulation, I get a difference of 5 dB at a frequency of 300 MHz (see attached screenshot).

I was informed, that the simulation model was created for the default cut-off frequency of 80 MHz.

Which filter response is more correct? Datasheet or simulation model?

Are there any details to the filter topology, that is used in the PGA5807?

In the attachement you can find the screenshot and the LTspice simulation circuit.

Thank you very much!

Best regards,

Paul Rott

(Please visit the site to view this file)

TLV274: Differential Opamp Configuration startup behaviour

$
0
0

Part Number:TLV274

Hi,

 I am using the TLV274 Opamp sensing in a differential opamp configuration as shown below.

The output of this opamp is connected to a Comparator circuit which latches when Opamp output becomes more than the ref.

With the supply cap of the opamp being 0.1uF ceramic.

Problem: The opamp output as soon as the power supply switches on generates a spike.

This is how the comparator inputs (OPamp output and Reference)look like.

  

Yellow is the reference (The ramp in the reference is because while startup the power supply takes about 400us to reach the required supply of 5V) Scale is 0.5V/ div

Green is the opamp output(Scale is 0.5V/div)

The duration of the spike is about 50us

The peak of spike is 1.2V

Due to this spike the comparator begins to latch during the startup itself.

How do I mitigate this?

Regards,

Rajesh

OPA140: how to drive a guard ring in non inverting applications

$
0
0

Part Number:OPA140

Dear Support,

I am designing a low-noise, buffer/amplifier (non-inverting) with High-Z input based on OPA140. I am considering to lay out in the PCB a guard ring to

shield the input, non inverting pin, from leakeage current. Strangely enough, I have found in literature two differente approaches:

- driving the guard ring surrounding the inverting/non_inverting inputs with the inverting pin

see for instance fig.15 in the app. note:

and also fig. 28 in the paper:

- - driving the guard ring surrounding the inverting/non_inverting inputs with the NON inverting pin

see for instance fig. 26 in the app. note

and also fig.52 in the ADI datasheet:

I have to admit I feel a bit confused.

I would propend for the first approach: driving the guard ring with a clear low.impedance node seems very reasonable. However, it seems it is not the only way...

Any comment/advice would be very appreciated. Does the guard ring drivng scheme depend upon the specific Op Amp ? If so, what would be the best for

OPA140, OPA827 and OPA657 ?

Thank you for your time and support.

Regards,

Alberto

Analog Engineer's Pocket Reference Calculators are not working properly

$
0
0

From the App Store I was redirected to this forum. There is no decent reply to email address to start with for the app...

The Analog Engineer's Pocket Reference is a handy tool to have around sometimes. However if one would like to use the calculator section and is using an iPhone on an other language than English it doesn't work.

If can be solved easily (by the author) as he/she needs to "obey" the localisation functions for the different countries. In this particular case the use of the decimal point. In the Dutch language we use "," for a decimal point and a "." for a thousand separator. So please fix this...

Regards,

Roland 

TLE2022A-Q1: Test circuit for KSVR vs

$
0
0

Part Number:TLE2022A-Q1

Hi

Regarding to the following thread, do you have additional information.

1.
Did you measure that PSRR vs frequency in ambient temperature at 25℃.
Do you have PSRR vs frequency when the temperature is varied?

2.
TLE2022 has two devices but TLE2021 has single.
Could the PSRR result be applied per channel in each devcie?

3.
Could you show us a circuit which tested PSRR on the datasheet?

BestRegards


TLE2021A-Q1: PSRR vs freq over temperature

$
0
0

Part Number:TLE2021A-Q1

Hi

Regarding to the following thread, do you have additional information.

e2e.ti.com/.../600759

1.
Did you measure that PSRR vs frequency in ambient temperature at 25℃.
Do you have PSRR vs frequency when the temperature is varied?

2.
TLE2022 has two devices but TLE2021 has single.
Could the PSRR result be applied per channel in each devcie?

3.
Could you show us a circuit which tested PSRR on the datasheet?

BestRegards

AMC1301-Q1: AMC1301 design question...

$
0
0

Part Number:AMC1301-Q1

Dear Sir,

There are some questions about AMC1301 design, they are:

1. As datasheet, there are HV+ and HV- in page1, what did it mean? As parameters in datasheet, the VINN and VINP is not for high voltage.

My customer tested power rail is 10V~50V. Is AMC1301 OK for such input voltage?

 

2. Is there any special purpose to add gate driver and MOSFET for AMC1301? Others current shunt only need Rsense. (e.x. INA226)

TLE2022A-Q1: KSVR over temperature

$
0
0

Part Number:TLE2022A-Q1

Hi

Regarding to the following thread, do you have additional information?

1.
Did you measure that PSRR vs frequency in ambient temperature at 25℃?
Do you have PSRR vs frequency when the temperature is varied?

2.
TLE2022 has two devices but TLE2021 has single.
Could the PSRR result be applied per channel in each devcie?

3.
Could you show us a circuit what PSRR is tested with?

BestRegards

DRV2700: supply voltage

$
0
0

Part Number:DRV2700

The DRV2700 is supplied by a lithium metal battery. Vdd for DRV2700 is specified with 3-5.5V. What happens, if supply is going down to 2.5V, will DRV2700 still operate?

LMP7721MAEVALMF/NOPB: false output signal

$
0
0

Part Number: LMP7721MAEVALMF/NOPB

Hi,

Recently I purchased two of LMP7721 Evaluation board and configured them to Trans-impedance configuration with 1T Rf value. However, output stay at -1.5V for the both the boards with no input currents and does not responded to any input current signal. I checked all the components values and those are according to the specs. I will appreciate if someone give me a clue what might be wrong here. 

Thanks

Ishara

Viewing all 18973 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>